土屋佑介, 辺見英貴
大阪産業大学経営論集 21(2・3合併) 2020年6月1日 筆頭著者
The purpose of this research is to clarify the GioiaMethodology (Gioia, Corley, & Hamilton, 2012), which
has attracted attention as a qualitative method. Through a comparative analysis with the Eisenhardt (1989)
template, we divided it into five items; epistemological foundations and research orientation, the need for
prior research, data collection, logic of the analysis, and rhetoric of the writing. As a result, we proposed a
taxonomy that organized the commonalities and differences between the two templates, and introduced a
method to increase the rigor of case studies. Finally, we discussed three limitations in Gioia et al.(2012).